Jan 18, 2017 by
After caring for an injured car accident patient, hospitals look for the most expedient, maximized reimbursement available to them for payment. Personal Injury Protection (PIP) was created by the legislature, as part of the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, to help ensure quick care for the injured person and prompt payment to the medical provider. Over the last two years, state district courts have been split over whether or not ... [Read More]
Jan 11, 2017 by
Florida car accident trials can become intricate, complicated lawsuits to litigate. This can be seen in a recent appellate case (No. 3D13-2005) that addresses whether or not it was improper for the trial court to allow evidence of the at-fault driver’s intoxication during the compensatory damages phase of the trial. The case stems from a serious car accident in which the injured party was struck head-on by an intoxicated, uninsured motorist. ... [Read More]
Jan 4, 2017 by
Obtaining the damages available in a personal injury lawsuit often goes beyond holding the at-fault party accountable. In car accident cases, the insurers to the parties in the accident must abide by certain duties while handling the case. If an insurer does not attempt to settle in good faith, the insured may file an action against the insurer. Often, if the insured is the at-fault party in the original car accident, ... [Read More]
Dec 29, 2016 by
One of the important functions of a civil lawsuit is obtaining damages from the at-fault party or parties in an attempt to be made whole. Another is to hold accountable the person, people, or entity responsible. When multiple parties create a negligent environment, civil actions can become complicated. Each personal injury case poses its own unique challenges, depending on the circumstances of the accident. An unpublished federal opinion, Seaboard Spirit Ltd. ... [Read More]
Dec 22, 2016 by
The Supreme Court in Florida recently settled a division among the District Courts of Appeal on whether or not a medical malpractice arbitration agreement was void when it included terms only favorable to the hospital. In Hernandez v. Crespo (No. SC15-67), the Supreme Court determined that any arbitration agreement that left out required provisions of the Medical Malpractice Act and was only favorable to medical providers was void as against ... [Read More]
Dec 15, 2016 by
Personal injury lawsuits must prove four things: that there was a duty created by statute or case law and that the at-fault party was obligated by the duty, that the at-fault party failed to uphold that duty, that injuries resulted from this failure, and that a certain amount of damages were incurred from the injury. While it is essential to prove the first three elements in order to obtain monetary damages, it is ... [Read More]
Dec 8, 2016 by
In Florida car accident cases, it is commonplace to see an insurance company indemnify, or take on a personal injury action on behalf of its insured. It is not often a hospital takes on a claim on behalf of a patient, but it happened in the recent Florida Court of Appeal case, Putnam Community Medical Center v. Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association (aka NICA), No.1D16-32. The appellate court certified ... [Read More]
Nov 28, 2016 by
Part of the proof that must be presented in a Florida car accident case are the damages that one suffered as a result of the accident. These include lost wages, medical expenses, and future medical expenses. The Fifth District Court of Appeal recently reviewed a directed verdict regarding damages in favor of an injured driver in Auto Club Ins. Co. of Florida v. Babin (Case No. 5D15-1337). In this case, ... [Read More]
Nov 23, 2016 by
When an accident happens while working, one generally counts on insurance to be available through one's employer. A Fourth District Court of Appeal case, Gelsomino v. Ace American Ins. Co. (No. 4D14-4767), deals with the nightmare scenario of an employee seriously injuring himself in a car accident, only to find that the broker tasked with obtaining insurance for his employer failed to do so properly. In this case, the Court of Appeal ... [Read More]
Nov 16, 2016 by
Filing lawsuits against a governmental entity is different from filing lawsuits against an at-fault individual or business. Historically, under case law, the doctrine of sovereign immunity shielded governmental entities from liability in order to allow governance to proceed. Through various statutes and cases, governments can now be held liable for negligent acts. For governmental tort liability to exist, there must be “either an underlying common law or statutory duty of ... [Read More]
Call Us Today - It's Free