All types of personal injury claims have a statute of limitations that sets an outer time limit for when an injured person may bring a claim against the party that they suspect was responsible for an accident.

Personal Injury Lawyers Representing Residents of Stuart

Well over five million Americans suffer from some form of paralysis, many because of  a brain injury or spinal cord damage caused by accidents in which careless behavior played a significant role. If you or a family member has been diagnosed with paralysis following an accident that was someone else’s fault, the Stuart personal injury attorneys at Donaldson & Weston can help you pursue a settlement or judgment. Compensation through a legal claim may help you pay your medical bills, offset your lost earnings, and compensate you for the pain and suffering caused by your injuries.

Explore Your Options After an Accident Resulting in Paralysis

Accidents that result in paralysis are most common in men under the age of 30, but they may happen to anyone. Injuries to the brain or spine may cause paralysis of the limbs as well as loss of normal lung function. The medical costs, home care, rehabilitative services, special equipment, and other expenses associated with paralysis may be very high. A skilled personal injury attorney in Stuart can help a plaintiff in a car accident or slip and fall case obtain copies of their medical records and speak with treating physicians about the plaintiff’s future prognosis. Doctors and other expert witnesses may be called to testify on behalf of the plaintiff at trial so that this information is presented to the jury in a manner that laypersons can understand clearly.

In a personal injury lawsuit arising from an accident that resulted in paraplegia, quadriplegia, or another form of paralysis, the plaintiff has the burden of proving their case by a preponderance of the evidence. If the paralysis was caused by a motor vehicle collision or most other ordinary situations, the plaintiff’s claim will be based on the law of negligence. The goal would be to show that the defendant owed the plaintiff a legal duty and breached it, as well as causation connecting the breach to the accident and the injuries that the plaintiff suffered. To establish causation, the harm that befell the plaintiff must have been a foreseeable consequence of the defendant’s actions.

There is often significant resistance from a defendant and their insurance company in accident cases resulting in paralysis. This may be due to the defendant’s reluctance to accept responsibility for inflicting a catastrophic injury and providing the substantial amounts of compensation that likely will be needed. There may even be an attempt to blame the victim for the accident. If the defendant can show that the victim was even partially at fault, the defendant will not need to fully compensate the plaintiff for their injuries. As a result, a victim should make sure to enlist an experienced personal injury attorney serving Stuart who can present a persuasive case that underscores the defendant’s responsibility.